Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH 01/21] net: slight optimization of addr compare for some modules

2013-12-23 Thread Ding Tianhong
On 2013/12/24 1:20, Alexander Duyck wrote: > On 12/22/2013 09:09 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote: >> Use the recently added and possibly more efficient >> ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp. >> >> Cc: "David S. Miller" >> Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Cc:

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH 01/21] net: slight optimization of addr compare for some modules

2013-12-23 Thread Greg Rose
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:20:37 -0800 Alexander Duyck wrote: > On 12/22/2013 09:09 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote: > > Use the recently added and possibly more efficient > > ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp. > > > > Cc: "David S. Miller" > > Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org > > Cc:

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH 01/21] net: slight optimization of addr compare for some modules

2013-12-23 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 12/22/2013 09:09 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote: > Use the recently added and possibly more efficient > ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp. > > Cc: "David S. Miller" > Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net > Signed-off-by:

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH 01/21] net: slight optimization of addr compare for some modules

2013-12-23 Thread Alexander Duyck
On 12/22/2013 09:09 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote: Use the recently added and possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp. Cc: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH 01/21] net: slight optimization of addr compare for some modules

2013-12-23 Thread Greg Rose
On Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:20:37 -0800 Alexander Duyck alexander.h.du...@intel.com wrote: On 12/22/2013 09:09 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote: Use the recently added and possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp. Cc: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net Cc:

Re: [E1000-devel] [PATCH 01/21] net: slight optimization of addr compare for some modules

2013-12-23 Thread Ding Tianhong
On 2013/12/24 1:20, Alexander Duyck wrote: On 12/22/2013 09:09 PM, Ding Tianhong wrote: Use the recently added and possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp. Cc: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

[PATCH 01/21] net: slight optimization of addr compare for some modules

2013-12-22 Thread Ding Tianhong
Use the recently added and possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp. Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong --- drivers/net/bonding/bond_3ad.c

[PATCH 01/21] net: slight optimization of addr compare for some modules

2013-12-22 Thread Ding Tianhong
Use the recently added and possibly more efficient ether_addr_equal_unaligned to instead of memcmp. Cc: David S. Miller da...@davemloft.net Cc: net...@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: e1000-de...@lists.sourceforge.net Signed-off-by: Ding Tianhong dingtianh...@huawei.com ---