RE: [PATCH 01/24] inet_net_pton.3: Use 'PRIx32' rather than "%x" when printing 'uint32_t' values

From: Michael Kerrisk > Sent: 11 September 2020 10:31 > > Hi Alex, > > On 9/10/20 11:13 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar > > --- > > man3/inet_net_pton.3 | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/man3/inet_net_pton.3

Re: [PATCH 01/24] inet_net_pton.3: Use 'PRIx32' rather than "%x" when printing 'uint32_t' values

Hi Alex, On 9/11/20 11:39 AM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi Michael, [...] >> So, I'm in a little bit of doubt about patches 01 and 02. Does >> this really win us anything? On the one hand, %"PRIx32" is more >> difficult to read than %x. On the other, does it win us anything >> in terms of

Re: [PATCH 01/24] inet_net_pton.3: Use 'PRIx32' rather than "%x" when printing 'uint32_t' values

Hi Michael, On 2020-09-11 11:31, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: Hi Alex, On 9/10/20 11:13 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar --- man3/inet_net_pton.3 | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man3/inet_net_pton.3

Re: [PATCH 01/24] inet_net_pton.3: Use 'PRIx32' rather than "%x" when printing 'uint32_t' values

Hi Alex, On 9/10/20 11:13 PM, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar > --- > man3/inet_net_pton.3 | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/man3/inet_net_pton.3 b/man3/inet_net_pton.3 > index 00f94b9d4..d74a33d74 100644 > ---

[PATCH 01/24] inet_net_pton.3: Use 'PRIx32' rather than "%x" when printing 'uint32_t' values

Signed-off-by: Alejandro Colomar --- man3/inet_net_pton.3 | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man3/inet_net_pton.3 b/man3/inet_net_pton.3 index 00f94b9d4..d74a33d74 100644 --- a/man3/inet_net_pton.3 +++ b/man3/inet_net_pton.3 @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ Raw address: