On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:23:48PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Yeah somewhere the bit-banging from the LL-prints that just
> hammer the hardware start conflicting with the kernel control
> over the same port. I guess it's the same for all users of the
> PL011.
That shouldn't happen, unless the p
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> [Me]
>> I don't know what is the problem with Olof's machine :-/
>
> Oh! Well, to start with apparantly u8500_defconfig doesn't have
> APPENDED_DTB enabled, which explains some of the confusion here.
Oh. Well honestly I think we will never
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 4:13 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On 11 Sep 2013 10:33, "Linus Walleij" wrote:
>
>>> No it was something transient, after a clean rebuild it boots
>>> just fine. :-/
>>>
>>> I'll see if I can boot the same uImage on the
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On 11 Sep 2013 10:33, "Linus Walleij" wrote:
>> No it was something transient, after a clean rebuild it boots
>> just fine. :-/
>>
>> I'll see if I can boot the same uImage on the Snowball too.
Yeah Snowball boots the same DT image with just
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> Weird, yeah there is something wrong on Torvalds' HEAD, with
>> earlyprint it says:
>>
>> Uncompressing Linux... done, booting the kernel.
>> Error: unrecognized/unsupported processor variant (0x412
On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> > I have a very weird experience with snowball right now. I noticed this
> > yesterday when I decided to look at why multi_v7_defconfig doesn't
> > boot on it:
> >
> > * u8500_defconfig doesn't
On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Olof Johansson wrote:
> [pruning out the iio list/people]
>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >> > Turns out that they're actually not required and the driver probes just
> >> > fine without them. Th
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> I have a very weird experience with snowball right now. I noticed this
> yesterday when I decided to look at why multi_v7_defconfig doesn't
> boot on it:
>
> * u8500_defconfig doesn't boot as a DT kernel, since the machine ID is
> still ena
[pruning out the iio list/people]
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > Turns out that they're actually not required and the driver probes just
>> > fine without them. The ID is incorrect at the moment anyway. They actually
>>
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > Turns out that they're actually not required and the driver probes just
> > fine without them. The ID is incorrect at the moment anyway. They actually
> > currently specify the stn8815.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
>
> How did you test
Hi,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:49 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> Turns out that they're actually not required and the driver probes just
> fine without them. The ID is incorrect at the moment anyway. They actually
> currently specify the stn8815.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
How did you test this patch?
Turns out that they're actually not required and the driver probes just
fine without them. The ID is incorrect at the moment anyway. They actually
currently specify the stn8815.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/ste-dbx5x0.dtsi | 5 -
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a
12 matches
Mail list logo
