Re: [PATCH 01/50] sched: monolithic code dump of what is being pushed upstream

2013-09-13 Thread Mel Gorman
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:11:03AM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote: > On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > @@ -5045,15 +5038,50 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env) > > > > static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data); > > > > +static int should_we_balance(stru

Re: [PATCH 01/50] sched: monolithic code dump of what is being pushed upstream

2013-09-10 Thread Hillf Danton
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > @@ -5045,15 +5038,50 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env) > > static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data); > > +static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env) > +{ > + struct sched_group *sg = env->sd->groups; >

Re: [PATCH 01/50] sched: monolithic code dump of what is being pushed upstream

2013-09-10 Thread Joonsoo Kim
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:31:41AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > @@ -5045,15 +5038,50 @@ static int need_active_balance(struct lb_env *env) > > static int active_load_balance_cpu_stop(void *data); > > +static int should_we_balance(struct lb_env *env) > +{ > + struct sched_group *sg = env->sd-

[PATCH 01/50] sched: monolithic code dump of what is being pushed upstream

2013-09-10 Thread Mel Gorman
From: Peter Zijlstra So I have the below patch in front of all your patches. It contains the 10 or so sched,fair patches I posted to lkml the other day. I used these to poke at the group_imb crud, am now digging through traces of perf bench numa to see if there's anything else I need. like said