On Sun, 20 Mar 2016, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov
> wrote:
> >
> > Hm. Okay. Re-split this way would take some time. I'll post updated
> > patchset tomorrow.
>
> Oh, I was assuming this was automated with coccinelle or at least some
> simple shell s
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Kirill A. Shutemov
wrote:
>
> Hm. Okay. Re-split this way would take some time. I'll post updated
> patchset tomorrow.
Oh, I was assuming this was automated with coccinelle or at least some
simple shell scripting..
Generally, for things like this, automation rea
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:13:47PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> >>
> >> It doesn't help legibility or testing, so let's just do it in one big go.
> >
> > Might make sense splitting it by the thing being removed, though - easier
> > to visually v
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Al Viro wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't help legibility or testing, so let's just do it in one big go.
>
> Might make sense splitting it by the thing being removed, though - easier
> to visually verify that it's doing the right thing when all replacements
> are of the sam
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:54:56AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I'm OK with this, but let's not do this as a hundred small patches, OK?
>
> It doesn't help legibility or testing, so let's just do it in one big go.
Might make sense splitting it by the thing being removed, though - easier
to visu
PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time ago
with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page cache with
bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.
This promise never materialized. And unlikely will.
We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
P
6 matches
Mail list logo
