On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:39:21PM +, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The driver for the sunxi-ss crypto engine is not entirely 64-bit safe,
> compilation on arm64 spits some warnings.
> The proper fix was deemed to involved [1], so since 64-bit SoCs won't
> have this IP block we just disable this driv
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:39:21PM +, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The driver for the sunxi-ss crypto engine is not entirely 64-bit safe,
> compilation on arm64 spits some warnings.
> The proper fix was deemed to involved [1], so since 64-bit SoCs won't
> have this IP block we just disable this driv
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:39:21PM +, Andre Przywara wrote:
> The driver for the sunxi-ss crypto engine is not entirely 64-bit safe,
> compilation on arm64 spits some warnings.
> The proper fix was deemed to involved [1], so since 64-bit SoCs won't
> have this IP block we just disable this driv
The driver for the sunxi-ss crypto engine is not entirely 64-bit safe,
compilation on arm64 spits some warnings.
The proper fix was deemed to involved [1], so since 64-bit SoCs won't
have this IP block we just disable this driver for 64-bit.
[1]:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-ker
4 matches
Mail list logo