Hi Tony,
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 04:01:03AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren [160412 13:53]:
> > * Sebastian Reichel [160324 17:16]:
> > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > > I _think_, that your HW team decided to cover the first and the
> > > > >
* Tony Lindgren [160412 13:53]:
> * Sebastian Reichel [160324 17:16]:
> > On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > > I _think_, that your HW team decided to cover the first and the
> > > > last few pixels of the 864 display with plastic. So technically
> > > > it's a 864
* Sebastian Reichel [160324 17:16]:
> On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> > > I _think_, that your HW team decided to cover the first and the
> > > last few pixels of the 864 display with plastic. So technically
> > > it's a 864 display, but effectively it's 854.
Sebast
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 05:11:15PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > As I said: I did use 864 initially. That results in missing pixels.
>
> Sorry, I didn't mean to question this. Go with what works, not with some
> old fart's ramblings!
No proble
On Thu, 24 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> As I said: I did use 864 initially. That results in missing pixels.
Sorry, I didn't mean to question this. Go with what works, not with some
old fart's ramblings!
> I _think_, that your HW team decided to cover the first and the
> last few pixels o
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:03:01PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 02:40:53PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> >> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 02:14:26PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart w
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 02:40:53PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 02:14:26PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> >> [...]
>> >> > +
>> >> > + /* panel is 480x464 wi
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 02:40:53PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 02:14:26PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> [...]
> >> > +
> >> > +/* panel is 480x464 with top and bottom 5 lines not
> >> > visible */
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 02:14:26PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> [...]
>> > +
>> > + /* panel is 480x464 with top and bottom 5 lines not visible */
>>
>> I assume you mean 480x864 ?
>
> Yes, nice catch. Basically the screen is 480x864,
Hi Laurent,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 02:14:26PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> [...]
> > +
> > + /* panel is 480x464 with top and bottom 5 lines not visible */
>
> I assume you mean 480x864 ?
Yes, nice catch. Basically the screen is 480x864, but only
480x854 are visible.
> > +
Hi Sebastian,
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday 08 March 2016 17:39:34 Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> Signed-off-By: Sebastian Reichel
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts | 71 +
> 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-
Signed-off-By: Sebastian Reichel
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts | 71
1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/omap3-n950.dts
index 0885b34d5d7d..41b8fb585272 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/o
12 matches
Mail list logo