On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 22:25, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 06:11:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > The ADC in S3C/S5P/Exynos SoCs can be used also for handling touch
> > screen. In such case the second interrupt is required. This second
> > interrupt can be anyway
On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 06:11:18PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The ADC in S3C/S5P/Exynos SoCs can be used also for handling touch
> screen. In such case the second interrupt is required. This second
> interrupt can be anyway provided, even without touch screens. This
> fixes dtbs_check
On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 18:11:18 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The ADC in S3C/S5P/Exynos SoCs can be used also for handling touch
> screen. In such case the second interrupt is required. This second
> interrupt can be anyway provided, even without touch screens. This
> fixes dtbs_check
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 at 18:39, Jonathan Cameron
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:11:18 +0200
> Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> > The ADC in S3C/S5P/Exynos SoCs can be used also for handling touch
> > screen. In such case the second interrupt is required. This second
> > interrupt can be anyway
On Mon, 7 Sep 2020 18:11:18 +0200
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The ADC in S3C/S5P/Exynos SoCs can be used also for handling touch
> screen. In such case the second interrupt is required. This second
> interrupt can be anyway provided, even without touch screens. This
> fixes dtbs_check
The ADC in S3C/S5P/Exynos SoCs can be used also for handling touch
screen. In such case the second interrupt is required. This second
interrupt can be anyway provided, even without touch screens. This
fixes dtbs_check warnings like:
arch/arm/boot/dts/s5pv210-aquila.dt.yaml: adc@e170:
6 matches
Mail list logo