Re: [PATCH 02/27] mm, vmscan: Check if cpusets are enabled during direct reclaim

2016-03-09 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 03/09/2016 12:59 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:31:40PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> On 02/23/2016 04:04 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: >>> Direct reclaim obeys cpusets but misses the cpusets_enabled() check. >>> The overhead is unlikely to be measurable in the direct reclaim >>>

Re: [PATCH 02/27] mm, vmscan: Check if cpusets are enabled during direct reclaim

2016-03-09 Thread Mel Gorman
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 12:31:40PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: > On 02/23/2016 04:04 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > Direct reclaim obeys cpusets but misses the cpusets_enabled() check. > > The overhead is unlikely to be measurable in the direct reclaim > > path which is expensive but there is no harm

Re: [PATCH 02/27] mm, vmscan: Check if cpusets are enabled during direct reclaim

2016-03-03 Thread Vlastimil Babka
On 02/23/2016 04:04 PM, Mel Gorman wrote: > Direct reclaim obeys cpusets but misses the cpusets_enabled() check. > The overhead is unlikely to be measurable in the direct reclaim > path which is expensive but there is no harm is doing it. > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman > --- > mm/vmscan.c | 2 +-

Re: [PATCH 02/27] mm, vmscan: Check if cpusets are enabled during direct reclaim

2016-02-23 Thread Johannes Weiner
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 03:04:25PM +, Mel Gorman wrote: > Direct reclaim obeys cpusets but misses the cpusets_enabled() check. > The overhead is unlikely to be measurable in the direct reclaim > path which is expensive but there is no harm is doing it. > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by:

[PATCH 02/27] mm, vmscan: Check if cpusets are enabled during direct reclaim

2016-02-23 Thread Mel Gorman
Direct reclaim obeys cpusets but misses the cpusets_enabled() check. The overhead is unlikely to be measurable in the direct reclaim path which is expensive but there is no harm is doing it. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman --- mm/vmscan.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --g

[PATCH 02/27] mm, vmscan: Check if cpusets are enabled during direct reclaim

2016-02-23 Thread Mel Gorman
Direct reclaim obeys cpusets but misses the cpusets_enabled() check. The overhead is unlikely to be measurable in the direct reclaim path which is expensive but there is no harm is doing it. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman --- mm/vmscan.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --g