[PATCH 024/100] workqueue: cond_resched() after processing each work item

3.5.7.23 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Tejun Heo commit b22ce2785d97423846206cceec4efee0c4afd980 upstream. If !PREEMPT, a kworker running work items back to back can hog CPU. This becomes dangerous when a self-requeueing

[PATCH 024/100] workqueue: cond_resched() after processing each work item

3.5.7.23 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. -- From: Tejun Heo t...@kernel.org commit b22ce2785d97423846206cceec4efee0c4afd980 upstream. If !PREEMPT, a kworker running work items back to back can hog CPU. This becomes dangerous when a