Andrew Morton wrote:
Jeremy, I'll duck these patches for now, sorry. Mainly on
i-already-have-enough-x86-stuff grounds.
That's fine. I think it breaks x86-64 at the moment anyway. And I
haven't got much feedback about it.
There's a bit of overlap between this work and git-newsetup, bu
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 09:40:31 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >
> >> +#define EIN_PROGRAM_CHECKSUM 3 /* ip style checksum of the memory
> >> image. */
> >>
> >
> > Why on earth use one of the weakest verific
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
>> +#define EIN_PROGRAM_CHECKSUM3 /* ip style checksum of the memory
>> image. */
>>
>
> Why on earth use one of the weakest verificants in common use?
I don't know. I copied this stuff from the original relocatable kernel
patc
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> +#define EIN_PROGRAM_CHECKSUM 3 /* ip style checksum of the memory image. */
Why on earth use one of the weakest verificants in common use?
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTEC
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/elf_boot.h | 15 +++
1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
===
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/elf_boot.h
@@ -0,
5 matches
Mail list logo
