On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:59:19AM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> The SDM is like software -- usually (but not always) you are better
> off with the latest version:-)
If only it existed as a .tex file in a git repo. It has been very useful
to have older versions around a number of times.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 8:54 AM Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > It would've been nice to have the CPUID instruction 1F leaf reference
> > > 3B-3.9 in the SDM, and maybe mention this here too.
> >
> > I didn't mention SDM sections because they change -- leaving stale
> > pointers in our commit message
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 10:08:48AM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> Thanks for the comments, Peter. I'll update the patch to address the
> syntax points. (Maybe checkpatch.pl should be updated to reflect your
> preferences?).
Don't know about checkpatch; I ignore plenty of its output. I think tglx
start
-
From: Brice Goglin [mailto:brice.gog...@inria.fr]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2019 5:04 AM
To: Len Brown ; x...@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Brown, Len ;
linux-...@vger.kernel.org; Like Xu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/11] x86 topology: Add CPUID.1F multi-die/package support
Le 19/02
On 2019/2/24 18:04, Brice Goglin wrote:
Le 19/02/2019 à 04:40, Len Brown a écrit :
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
index ccd1f2a8e557..4250a87f57db 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ static bool match_smt(
Le 19/02/2019 à 04:40, Len Brown a écrit :
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> index ccd1f2a8e557..4250a87f57db 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
> @@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ static bool match_smt(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct
>
Thanks for the comments, Peter. I'll update the patch to address the
syntax points. (Maybe checkpatch.pl should be updated to reflect your
preferences?).
About macros vs C. I agree with your preference.
I used macros to be consistent with the existing code, and to be as
backport friendly as poss
On Mon, Feb 18, 2019 at 10:40:05PM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> From: Len Brown
>
> Some new systems have multiple software-visible die within each package.
> The new CPUID.1F leaf can enumerate this multi-die/package topology.
>
> CPUID.1F a super-set of the CPUID.B "Extended Toplogy Leaf",
> and
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 9:59 PM Like Xu wrote:
> > -/* leaf 0xb sub-leaf types */
> > +/* extended topology sub-leaf types */
> > #define INVALID_TYPE0
> > #define SMT_TYPE1
> > #define CORE_TYPE 2
> > +#define DIE_TYPE 5
>
> This patch set is going to export die topology
On 2019/2/19 11:40, Len Brown wrote:
From: Len Brown
Some new systems have multiple software-visible die within each package.
The new CPUID.1F leaf can enumerate this multi-die/package topology.
CPUID.1F a super-set of the CPUID.B "Extended Toplogy Leaf",
and a common updated routine can parse
>> @@ -461,7 +463,7 @@ static bool match_llc(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct
>> cpuinfo_x86 *o)
>>*/
>> static bool match_die(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, struct cpuinfo_x86 *o)
>> {
>> -if (c->>phys_proc_id == o->>phys_proc_id)
>> +if (c->>cpu_die_id == o->>cpu_die_id)
>> ret
On 2/18/2019 10:40 PM, Len Brown wrote:
From: Len Brown
Some new systems have multiple software-visible die within each package.
The new CPUID.1F leaf can enumerate this multi-die/package topology.
CPUID.1F a super-set of the CPUID.B "Extended Toplogy Leaf",
and a common updated routine can
From: Len Brown
Some new systems have multiple software-visible die within each package.
The new CPUID.1F leaf can enumerate this multi-die/package topology.
CPUID.1F a super-set of the CPUID.B "Extended Toplogy Leaf",
and a common updated routine can parse either leaf.
Legacy systems without C
13 matches
Mail list logo
