Re: [PATCH 03/12] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled

On Mon 24-08-15 13:09:42, Mel Gorman wrote: > There is a seqcounter that protects against spurious allocation failures > when a task is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need > to check the seqcounter until a cpuset exists. > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman > Acked-by: Christoph

Re: [PATCH 03/12] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled

On Mon 24-08-15 13:09:42, Mel Gorman wrote: There is a seqcounter that protects against spurious allocation failures when a task is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need to check the seqcounter until a cpuset exists. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman mgor...@techsingularity.net

[PATCH 03/12] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled

There is a seqcounter that protects against spurious allocation failures when a task is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need to check the seqcounter until a cpuset exists. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman Acked-by: Christoph Lameter Acked-by: David Rientjes Acked-by: Vlastimil

[PATCH 03/12] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled

There is a seqcounter that protects against spurious allocation failures when a task is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need to check the seqcounter until a cpuset exists. Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman mgor...@techsingularity.net Acked-by: Christoph Lameter c...@linux.com