As new_valid_dev always returns 1, so !new_valid_dev check is not
needed, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiao...@163.com>
---
 fs/9p/vfs_inode.c      | 3 ---
 fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c | 3 ---
 2 files changed, 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
index b1dc518..699941e 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
@@ -1368,9 +1368,6 @@ v9fs_vfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, 
umode_t mode, dev_t rde
                 dir->i_ino, dentry, mode,
                 MAJOR(rdev), MINOR(rdev));
 
-       if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
-               return -EINVAL;
-
        /* build extension */
        if (S_ISBLK(mode))
                sprintf(name, "b %u %u", MAJOR(rdev), MINOR(rdev));
diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c b/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c
index e8aa57d..cb899af 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode_dotl.c
@@ -829,9 +829,6 @@ v9fs_vfs_mknod_dotl(struct inode *dir, struct dentry 
*dentry, umode_t omode,
                 dir->i_ino, dentry, omode,
                 MAJOR(rdev), MINOR(rdev));
 
-       if (!new_valid_dev(rdev))
-               return -EINVAL;
-
        v9ses = v9fs_inode2v9ses(dir);
        dir_dentry = dentry->d_parent;
        dfid = v9fs_fid_lookup(dir_dentry);
-- 
1.9.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to