On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 9:41 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:56:52PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> > When calling show_stack_log_lvl() or dump_trace() with a regs argument,
>> > providing a stack pointer or frame
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:56:52PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> > When calling show_stack_log_lvl() or dump_trace() with a regs argument,
>> > providing a stack pointer or frame
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 02:56:52PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > When calling show_stack_log_lvl() or dump_trace() with a regs argument,
> > providing a stack pointer or frame pointer is redundant.
> >
>
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> When calling show_stack_log_lvl() or dump_trace() with a regs argument,
> providing a stack pointer or frame pointer is redundant.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c
> index 358fe1c..c533b8b 100
When calling show_stack_log_lvl() or dump_trace() with a regs argument,
providing a stack pointer or frame pointer is redundant.
Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf d
---
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c| 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_32.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c | 5 +
arch/x86/opr
5 matches
Mail list logo