On Sun, 30 Jan 2005, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > LRW and the GF(2**128) code is not configurable?
> >
> > No, it's a cipher mode. None of the modes is configurable.
>
> Is LRW an appropriate mode for anything but block storage?
Looks like it is only specified for this case.
"The scope of this do
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 12:49:29PM +0100, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
>
> In fact, it's lowerCamelCase, that's intentional.
The problem with mixing of naming styles is that it becomes
difficult to remember what style is used where. Is it foo_bar_baz() or
foobarbaz() or fooBarBaz() or FooBarBaz()?
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 12:57:50PM +0100, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
> > This is the core of my LRW patch. Added test vectors.
> > http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1619/email/pdf00017.pdf
>
> Please include a URL for the standard at the top of the LRW code a
On Sat, 2005-01-29 at 16:02 -0800, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 12:57:50PM +0100, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
> > This is the core of my LRW patch. Added test vectors.
> > http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1619/email/pdf00017.pdf
>
> Please include a URL for the standard at the top of t
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 12:57:50PM +0100, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
> This is the core of my LRW patch. Added test vectors.
> http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1619/email/pdf00017.pdf
Please include a URL for the standard at the top of the LRW code and
next to the test vectors. I had to search around
This is the core of my LRW patch. Added test vectors.
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1619/email/pdf00017.pdf
Please notice, that this is not a patch for dm-crypt. I will
post a nice splitted patch set for dm later that day.
Signed-off-by: Fruhwirth Clemens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- 3/crypto/cipher.
6 matches
Mail list logo