Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock. VFS-level changes
will soon make it important that the list_heads in file_lock are
always properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields
---
Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock. VFS-level changes
will soon make it important that the list_heads in file_lock are
always properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
Reviewed-by: J. Bruce Fields
---
Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock.
VFS-level changes will soon make it important that the
list_heads in file_lock are always properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
---
fs/gfs2/file.c | 10 +-
Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock.
VFS-level changes will soon make it important that the
list_heads in file_lock are always properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
---
fs/gfs2/file.c | 10 +-
On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 12:48 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05 2018, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 12:30 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
> > > initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock.
> > >
On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 12:48 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05 2018, Jeff Layton wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 12:30 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
> > > initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock.
> > >
On Mon, Nov 05 2018, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 12:30 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>> Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
>> initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock.
>> VFS-level changes will soon make it important that the
>> list_heads in
On Mon, Nov 05 2018, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 12:30 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
>> Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
>> initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock.
>> VFS-level changes will soon make it important that the
>> list_heads in
On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 12:30 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
> initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock.
> VFS-level changes will soon make it important that the
> list_heads in file_lock are always properly initialized.
>
>
On Mon, 2018-11-05 at 12:30 +1100, NeilBrown wrote:
> Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
> initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock.
> VFS-level changes will soon make it important that the
> list_heads in file_lock are always properly initialized.
>
>
Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock.
VFS-level changes will soon make it important that the
list_heads in file_lock are always properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
---
fs/gfs2/file.c | 10 +-
Rather than assuming all-zeros is sufficient, use the available API to
initialize the file_lock structure use for unlock.
VFS-level changes will soon make it important that the
list_heads in file_lock are always properly initialized.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
---
fs/gfs2/file.c | 10 +-
12 matches
Mail list logo
