On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 11:03:50AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:17:26 +1000 NeilBrown wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:37:56 +1000 Dave Chinner wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:03:36PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> > > > - /*
> > > > -* Given that
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 16:17:26 +1000 NeilBrown wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:37:56 +1000 Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:03:36PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > > - /*
> > > - * Given that we do not allow direct reclaim to call us, we should
> > > - * never be called while i
On Wed, 16 Apr 2014 15:37:56 +1000 Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:03:36PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> > Currently both xfs and nfs will handle PF_FSTRANS by disabling
> > __GFP_FS.
> >
> > Make this effect global by repurposing memalloc_noio_flags (which
> > does the same thing f
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 02:03:36PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> Currently both xfs and nfs will handle PF_FSTRANS by disabling
> __GFP_FS.
>
> Make this effect global by repurposing memalloc_noio_flags (which
> does the same thing for PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO and __GFP_IO) to generally
> impost the task flag
Currently both xfs and nfs will handle PF_FSTRANS by disabling
__GFP_FS.
Make this effect global by repurposing memalloc_noio_flags (which
does the same thing for PF_MEMALLOC_NOIO and __GFP_IO) to generally
impost the task flags on a gfp_t.
Due to this repurposing we change the name of memalloc_no
5 matches
Mail list logo