Re: [PATCH 04/32] ring-buffer: Redefine the unimplemented RINGBUF_TIME_TIME_STAMP

2017-07-02 Thread Joel Fernandes (Google)
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP is defined but not used, and from what I can > gather was reserved for something like an absolute timestamp feature > for the ring buffer, if not a complete replacement of the current >

Re: [PATCH 04/32] ring-buffer: Redefine the unimplemented RINGBUF_TIME_TIME_STAMP

2017-07-02 Thread Joel Fernandes (Google)
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 3:49 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote: > RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP is defined but not used, and from what I can > gather was reserved for something like an absolute timestamp feature > for the ring buffer, if not a complete replacement of the current > time_delta scheme. > > This code

[PATCH 04/32] ring-buffer: Redefine the unimplemented RINGBUF_TIME_TIME_STAMP

2017-06-26 Thread Tom Zanussi
RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP is defined but not used, and from what I can gather was reserved for something like an absolute timestamp feature for the ring buffer, if not a complete replacement of the current time_delta scheme. This code redefines RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP to implement absolute time

[PATCH 04/32] ring-buffer: Redefine the unimplemented RINGBUF_TIME_TIME_STAMP

2017-06-26 Thread Tom Zanussi
RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP is defined but not used, and from what I can gather was reserved for something like an absolute timestamp feature for the ring buffer, if not a complete replacement of the current time_delta scheme. This code redefines RINGBUF_TYPE_TIME_STAMP to implement absolute time