On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 04:59:23PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Maxime Ripard
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:42:56PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> >> On the SoCs that introduced the new timing mode for MMC controllers,
> >> both the old (where t
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 5:17 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:42:56PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> On the SoCs that introduced the new timing mode for MMC controllers,
>> both the old (where the clock delays are set in the CCU) and new
>> (where the clock delays are s
Hi Chen-Yu,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.13-rc1]
[cannot apply to robh/for-next clk/clk-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Chen-Yu-Tsai/
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 11:57:35AM +0200, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> >>> + if (host->use_new_timings) {
> >>> + ret = sunxi_ccu_set_mmc_timing_mode(host->clk_mmc, true);
> >>
> >> Can't this be solved through some other generic API/interface?
> >
> > The old discussion is here: https:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 02:42:56PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On the SoCs that introduced the new timing mode for MMC controllers,
> both the old (where the clock delays are set in the CCU) and new
> (where the clock delays are set in the MMC controller) timing modes
> are available, and we
On 14 July 2017 at 11:40, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 14 July 2017 at 08:42, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> On the SoCs that introduced the new timing mode for MMC controllers,
>>> both the old (where the clock delays are set in the CCU) and new
>>> (
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:26 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 14 July 2017 at 08:42, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>> On the SoCs that introduced the new timing mode for MMC controllers,
>> both the old (where the clock delays are set in the CCU) and new
>> (where the clock delays are set in the MMC controller)
On 14 July 2017 at 08:42, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On the SoCs that introduced the new timing mode for MMC controllers,
> both the old (where the clock delays are set in the CCU) and new
> (where the clock delays are set in the MMC controller) timing modes
> are available, and we have to support them
On the SoCs that introduced the new timing mode for MMC controllers,
both the old (where the clock delays are set in the CCU) and new
(where the clock delays are set in the MMC controller) timing modes
are available, and we have to support them both. However there are
two bits that control which mo
9 matches
Mail list logo