pt., 8 maj 2020 o 07:54 Heiner Kallweit napisał(a):
>
> On 08.05.2020 00:56, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Thu, 7 May 2020 19:03:44 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> >>> To implement Edwin's suggestion? Makes sense, but I'm no expert, let's
> >>> also CC Heiner since he was asking about it last ti
On 08.05.2020 00:56, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 7 May 2020 19:03:44 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>> To implement Edwin's suggestion? Makes sense, but I'm no expert, let's
>>> also CC Heiner since he was asking about it last time.
>>
>> Yes, because taking the last bit of priv_flags from
On Thu, 7 May 2020 19:03:44 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> To implement Edwin's suggestion? Makes sense, but I'm no expert, let's
>> also CC Heiner since he was asking about it last time.
>
> Yes, because taking the last bit of priv_flags from net_device seems
> to be more controversial but
czw., 7 maj 2020 o 18:53 Jakub Kicinski napisał(a):
>
> On Thu, 7 May 2020 11:25:01 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > śr., 6 maj 2020 o 19:12 Jakub Kicinski napisał(a):
> > >
> > > On Wed, 6 May 2020 08:39:47 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > wt., 5 maj 2020 o 19:31 Jakub Kicinski napi
On Thu, 7 May 2020 11:25:01 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> śr., 6 maj 2020 o 19:12 Jakub Kicinski napisał(a):
> >
> > On Wed, 6 May 2020 08:39:47 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > wt., 5 maj 2020 o 19:31 Jakub Kicinski napisał(a):
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, 5 May 2020 16:02:25 +0200 Ba
śr., 6 maj 2020 o 19:12 Jakub Kicinski napisał(a):
>
> On Wed, 6 May 2020 08:39:47 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > wt., 5 maj 2020 o 19:31 Jakub Kicinski napisał(a):
> > >
> > > On Tue, 5 May 2020 16:02:25 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski
> > > >
> > > > P
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:46 PM Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Re the last bit in priv_flags: is this really a problem though? It's
> not like struct net_device must remain stable - e.g. we can make
> priv_flags a bitmap.
Fair enough.
Regards,
Edwin Peer
On Wed, 6 May 2020 08:39:47 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> wt., 5 maj 2020 o 19:31 Jakub Kicinski napisał(a):
> >
> > On Tue, 5 May 2020 16:02:25 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski
> > >
> > > Provide devm_register_netdev() - a device resource managed variant
wt., 5 maj 2020 o 21:25 Edwin Peer napisał(a):
> > +
> > +static void devm_netdev_release(struct device *dev, void *this)
> > +{
> > + struct netdevice_devres *res = this;
> > +
> > + unregister_netdev(res->ndev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * devm_register_netdev - resource manage
wt., 5 maj 2020 o 19:31 Jakub Kicinski napisał(a):
>
> On Tue, 5 May 2020 16:02:25 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > From: Bartosz Golaszewski
> >
> > Provide devm_register_netdev() - a device resource managed variant
> > of register_netdev(). This new helper will only work for net_device
> >
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 7:05 AM Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski
>
> Provide devm_register_netdev() - a device resource managed variant
> of register_netdev(). This new helper will only work for net_device
> structs that have a parent device assigned and are devres managed
On Tue, 5 May 2020 16:02:25 +0200 Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> From: Bartosz Golaszewski
>
> Provide devm_register_netdev() - a device resource managed variant
> of register_netdev(). This new helper will only work for net_device
> structs that have a parent device assigned and are devres manage
From: Bartosz Golaszewski
Provide devm_register_netdev() - a device resource managed variant
of register_netdev(). This new helper will only work for net_device
structs that have a parent device assigned and are devres managed too.
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski
---
include/linux/netdevice
13 matches
Mail list logo
