On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 03:51:09PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Wow! I remember this stuff, even if from 3 years ago. Feels like a
> lifetime. Is this patch being applied to official Linux, hence this
> message? Xyratex collapsed, shed a mess of employees and sold the
> remnant to Seagate.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 03:51:09PM -0700, Bruce Korb wrote:
> Wow! I remember this stuff, even if from 3 years ago. Feels like a
> lifetime. Is this patch being applied to official Linux, hence this
> message? Xyratex collapsed, shed a mess of employees and sold the
> remnant to Seagate.
Wow! I remember this stuff, even if from 3 years ago. Feels like a
lifetime. Is this patch being applied to official Linux, hence this
message? Xyratex collapsed, shed a mess of employees and sold the
remnant to Seagate. Consequently, I don't really follow Lustre any
more. Sorry.
On
Wow! I remember this stuff, even if from 3 years ago. Feels like a
lifetime. Is this patch being applied to official Linux, hence this
message? Xyratex collapsed, shed a mess of employees and sold the
remnant to Seagate. Consequently, I don't really follow Lustre any
more. Sorry.
On
From: Bruce Korb
Convert most of the ldlm lock's l_flags references from direct
bit twiddling to using bit specific macros. A few multi-bit
operations are left as an exercise for the reader.
The changes are mostly in ldlm, but also in llite, osc and quota.
Also add a
From: Bruce Korb
Convert most of the ldlm lock's l_flags references from direct
bit twiddling to using bit specific macros. A few multi-bit
operations are left as an exercise for the reader.
The changes are mostly in ldlm, but also in llite, osc and quota.
Also add a multi-bit (mask) test.
6 matches
Mail list logo