On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 08:02:09PM +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> On 03/08/2013 04:02 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 13:12 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> >> It allows for cleaning up on a considerable amount of places. They did
> >> port_get, wakeup, kref_put. Now the only thing needed i
On 03/08/2013 04:02 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 13:12 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
>> It allows for cleaning up on a considerable amount of places. They did
>> port_get, wakeup, kref_put. Now the only thing needed is to call
>> tty_port_tty_wakeup which does exactly that.
>>
>> One
On Thu, 2013-03-07 at 13:12 +0100, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> It allows for cleaning up on a considerable amount of places. They did
> port_get, wakeup, kref_put. Now the only thing needed is to call
> tty_port_tty_wakeup which does exactly that.
>
> One exception is ifx6x60 where tty_wakeup was open-cod
It allows for cleaning up on a considerable amount of places. They did
port_get, wakeup, kref_put. Now the only thing needed is to call
tty_port_tty_wakeup which does exactly that.
One exception is ifx6x60 where tty_wakeup was open-coded. We now call
tty_wakeup properly there.
Signed-off-by: Jiri
4 matches
Mail list logo