On 11-04-17, 10:43, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:59:40AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > There is only one user of cpufreq_cooling_get_level() and that already
> > has pointer to the cpufreq_dev structure. It can directly call
> > get_level() instead and we can get rid of cpu
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:59:40AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> There is only one user of cpufreq_cooling_get_level() and that already
> has pointer to the cpufreq_dev structure. It can directly call
> get_level() instead and we can get rid of cpufreq_cooling_get_level().
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh
There is only one user of cpufreq_cooling_get_level() and that already
has pointer to the cpufreq_dev structure. It can directly call
get_level() instead and we can get rid of cpufreq_cooling_get_level().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
---
drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 33 +---
3 matches
Mail list logo