On Fri, 16 Aug 2019 20:41:22 +0200
Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 13:12 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > On 09/08/2019 10:31, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > > The "regs" property of the "mrvl,mmp2-mux-intc" devices are silly. They
> > > are offsets from intc's base, not addresses on the
On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 13:12 +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 09/08/2019 10:31, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> > The "regs" property of the "mrvl,mmp2-mux-intc" devices are silly. They
> > are offsets from intc's base, not addresses on the parent bus. At this
> > point it probably can't be fixed.
> >
> > O
On 09/08/2019 10:31, Lubomir Rintel wrote:
> The "regs" property of the "mrvl,mmp2-mux-intc" devices are silly. They
> are offsets from intc's base, not addresses on the parent bus. At this
> point it probably can't be fixed.
>
> On an OLPC XO-1.75 machine, the muxes are children of the intc, not
The "regs" property of the "mrvl,mmp2-mux-intc" devices are silly. They
are offsets from intc's base, not addresses on the parent bus. At this
point it probably can't be fixed.
On an OLPC XO-1.75 machine, the muxes are children of the intc, not the
axi bus, and thus of_address_to_resource() won't
4 matches
Mail list logo
