Re: [PATCH 05/32] Unionfs: do not use fsstack_copy_attr_all

2007-09-03 Thread Jan Engelhardt
On Sep 2 2007 22:20, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: >+/* copy a/m/ctime from the lower branch with the newest times */ >+static inline void unionfs_copy_attr_times(struct inode *upper) >+{ > >+ /* XXX: should we notify_change on our upper inode? */ I do not think so. Inotifying should

[PATCH 05/32] Unionfs: do not use fsstack_copy_attr_all

2007-09-02 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
From: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Unionfs needs a special fan-out version of fsstack_copy_attr_all, which is called unionfs_copy_attr_all. Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 12 +---

[PATCH 05/32] Unionfs: do not use fsstack_copy_attr_all

2007-09-02 Thread Josef 'Jeff' Sipek
From: Erez Zadok [EMAIL PROTECTED] Unionfs needs a special fan-out version of fsstack_copy_attr_all, which is called unionfs_copy_attr_all. Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok [EMAIL PROTECTED] Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 12 +---