On Sep 2 2007 22:20, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
>+/* copy a/m/ctime from the lower branch with the newest times */
>+static inline void unionfs_copy_attr_times(struct inode *upper)
>+{
>
>+ /* XXX: should we notify_change on our upper inode? */
I do not think so. Inotifying should
From: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unionfs needs a special fan-out version of fsstack_copy_attr_all, which is
called unionfs_copy_attr_all.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 12 +---
From: Erez Zadok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unionfs needs a special fan-out version of fsstack_copy_attr_all, which is
called unionfs_copy_attr_all.
Signed-off-by: Erez Zadok [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Josef 'Jeff' Sipek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/unionfs/dentry.c | 12 +---
3 matches
Mail list logo