On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 14:43 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 October 2007 03:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Provide a method to get the upper bound on the pages needed to allocate
> > a given number of objects from a given kmem_cache.
> >
>
> Fair enough, but just to make it a bit
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 14:43 +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 03:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Provide a method to get the upper bound on the pages needed to allocate
a given number of objects from a given kmem_cache.
Fair enough, but just to make it a bit easier, can
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 03:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Provide a method to get the upper bound on the pages needed to allocate
> a given number of objects from a given kmem_cache.
>
Fair enough, but just to make it a bit easier, can you provide a
little reason of why in this patch (or
Provide a method to get the upper bound on the pages needed to allocate
a given number of objects from a given kmem_cache.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/linux/slab.h |3 +
mm/slub.c| 82 +++
2 files
Provide a method to get the upper bound on the pages needed to allocate
a given number of objects from a given kmem_cache.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/slab.h |3 +
mm/slub.c| 82 +++
2 files
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 03:04, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Provide a method to get the upper bound on the pages needed to allocate
a given number of objects from a given kmem_cache.
Fair enough, but just to make it a bit easier, can you provide a
little reason of why in this patch (or reference
6 matches
Mail list logo