On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Cortex-A9 SoCs from Rockchip use a slightly modified variant of dw_mmc
> controllers that seems to require the SDMMC_CMD_USE_HOLD_REG bit to
> always be set.
>
> There also seem to be no other modifications (additional register etc)
> present,
Am Mittwoch, 5. Juni 2013, 16:00:43 schrieb Seungwon Jeon:
> On 06/03/13 7:59 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Cortex-A9 SoCs from Rockchip use a slightly modified variant of dw_mmc
> > controllers that seems to require the SDMMC_CMD_USE_HOLD_REG bit to
> > always be set.
> >
> > There also seem to be
On 06/03/13 7:59 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Cortex-A9 SoCs from Rockchip use a slightly modified variant of dw_mmc
> controllers that seems to require the SDMMC_CMD_USE_HOLD_REG bit to
> always be set.
>
> There also seem to be no other modifications (additional register etc)
> present, so to keep
Am Dienstag, 4. Juni 2013, 06:06:39 schrieb Jaehoon Chung:
> On 06/03/2013 07:59 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Cortex-A9 SoCs from Rockchip use a slightly modified variant of dw_mmc
> > controllers that seems to require the SDMMC_CMD_USE_HOLD_REG bit to
> > always be set.
> >
> > There also seem to
On 06/03/2013 07:59 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Cortex-A9 SoCs from Rockchip use a slightly modified variant of dw_mmc
> controllers that seems to require the SDMMC_CMD_USE_HOLD_REG bit to
> always be set.
>
> There also seem to be no other modifications (additional register etc)
> present, so to k
Cortex-A9 SoCs from Rockchip use a slightly modified variant of dw_mmc
controllers that seems to require the SDMMC_CMD_USE_HOLD_REG bit to
always be set.
There also seem to be no other modifications (additional register etc)
present, so to keep the footprint low, add this small variant to the
pltf
6 matches
Mail list logo