RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 06/11] i2c: imx-lpi2c: improve i2c driver probe priority

an.koe...@amd.com; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm- > ker...@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH 06/11] i2c: imx-lpi2c: improve i2c driver probe > priority > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:53:54PM +0800, Clark Wang wrote: > > From: Gao Pa

Re: [PATCH 06/11] i2c: imx-lpi2c: improve i2c driver probe priority

On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 02:53:54PM +0800, Clark Wang wrote: > From: Gao Pan > > use subsys_initcall for i2c driver to improve i2c driver probe priority > > Signed-off-by: Gao Pan I usually don't take subsys_initcall patches anymore. In most cases, the client drivers can be fixed instead. If

RE: [PATCH 06/11] i2c: imx-lpi2c: improve i2c driver probe priority

> From: Clark Wang > Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 2:54 PM > > use subsys_initcall for i2c driver to improve i2c driver probe priority Will this affect DMA support which will be probed much later compared with subsys_initcall? > > Signed-off-by: Gao Pan Add your sign-off > --- >

[PATCH 06/11] i2c: imx-lpi2c: improve i2c driver probe priority

From: Gao Pan use subsys_initcall for i2c driver to improve i2c driver probe priority Signed-off-by: Gao Pan --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c | 12 +++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-imx-lpi2c.c