On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 02:20:31PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > In what way? Other than the -gpios stuff (which would just be a trivial
> > thing if we wanted to change it)?
> That's mainly it.
I don't see that as meaningful or a good reaso
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:49:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>
>> Same question as Mark. Should this share bindings with arizona? The
>> arizona one looks a bit strange, so not sure we'd want to just copy it.
>
> In what way? Other than the -gp
On Mon, Apr 10, 2017 at 12:49:17PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Same question as Mark. Should this share bindings with arizona? The
> arizona one looks a bit strange, so not sure we'd want to just copy it.
In what way? Other than the -gpios stuff (which would just be a trivial
thing if we wanted
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:07:54AM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> This patch adds a driver for the internal LDO1 regulator on
> some Cirrus Logic Madera class codecs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/regulator/madera-ldo1.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 11:07:54AM +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> This patch adds a driver for the internal LDO1 regulator on
> some Cirrus Logic Madera class codecs.
There appear to be only data differences to the existing arizona driver,
is it possible to share the code?
signature.asc
Desc
This patch adds a driver for the internal LDO1 regulator on
some Cirrus Logic Madera class codecs.
Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax
---
.../devicetree/bindings/regulator/madera-ldo1.txt | 29 +++
MAINTAINERS| 3 +
driver
6 matches
Mail list logo
