ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
This patch has a few small conflicts with stuff in linux-next, which
we have to sort out in arm-soc.
Cc: Linus Walleij
Cc: Russell King
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
arch/arm/mach-int
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
> so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
>
> This patch has a few small conflicts with stuff in linux-next, which
> we have to sort out in arm-soc.
>
> Cc: Linus Walleij
>
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:19:11AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > ARM is moving to stricter checks on readl/write functions,
> > so we need to use the correct types everywhere.
> >
> > This patch has a few small conflicts with stuff in l
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:19:11AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> However if Russell applies some of the stuff that is pending
>> in his tracker (was pending uncertain acceptance of
>> CONFIG_ATAGS, which is merged now) this wi
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:46:21AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 12:19:11AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>
> >> However if Russell applies some of the stuff that is pending
> >> in his tracker (was pe
5 matches
Mail list logo