Hey, Vivek.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:49:11PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Eh? Then how would it compete with the children cfqgs? You can
> > consider it as the hidden leaf node competing with the children cfqgs,
> > right? So, you take the leaf weight and divide it by the total active
> >
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:33:14PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:27:36PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > What I do care about is atleast being able to read and understand the
> > code easily. Right now, it is hard to understand. I am still struggling
> > to wrap my
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:27:36PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> What I do care about is atleast being able to read and understand the
> code easily. Right now, it is hard to understand. I am still struggling
> to wrap my head around it.
Hmm... I thought it was really simple. Maybe I'm
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:17:38PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 03:53:18PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:41:20PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg->weight.
> > > Regardless of the
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 03:53:18PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:41:20PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg->weight.
> > Regardless of the number of active cfqgs or the amount of active
> > weights, a given
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:41:20PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg->weight.
> Regardless of the number of active cfqgs or the amount of active
> weights, a given weight value always scales charge the same way. This
> works fine as long as
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:41:20PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg-weight.
Regardless of the number of active cfqgs or the amount of active
weights, a given weight value always scales charge the same way. This
works fine as long as all
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 03:53:18PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:41:20PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg-weight.
Regardless of the number of active cfqgs or the amount of active
weights, a given weight
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:17:38PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 03:53:18PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 02:41:20PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg-weight.
Regardless of the number of
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:27:36PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
What I do care about is atleast being able to read and understand the
code easily. Right now, it is hard to understand. I am still struggling
to wrap my head around it.
Hmm... I thought it was really simple. Maybe I'm just
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 01:33:14PM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:27:36PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
What I do care about is atleast being able to read and understand the
code easily. Right now, it is hard to understand. I am still struggling
to wrap my head
Hey, Vivek.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:49:11PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
Eh? Then how would it compete with the children cfqgs? You can
consider it as the hidden leaf node competing with the children cfqgs,
right? So, you take the leaf weight and divide it by the total active
weight of
Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg->weight.
Regardless of the number of active cfqgs or the amount of active
weights, a given weight value always scales charge the same way. This
works fine as long as all cfqgs are treated equally regardless of
their positions in the
Currently, cfqg charges are scaled directly according to cfqg-weight.
Regardless of the number of active cfqgs or the amount of active
weights, a given weight value always scales charge the same way. This
works fine as long as all cfqgs are treated equally regardless of
their positions in the
14 matches
Mail list logo
