On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 07:51:43AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:23:09AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:48:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > There is no real problem merging ioends that go beyond i_size into an
> > > ioend that d
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:23:09AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:48:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > There is no real problem merging ioends that go beyond i_size into an
> > ioend that doesn't. We just need to move the append transaction to the
> > base ioend.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:52:04AM +0800, Zorro Lang wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:43:04PM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:23:09AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:48:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > > There is no real prob
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 09:43:04PM +, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:23:09AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:48:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > There is no real problem merging ioends that go beyond i_size into an
> > > ioend that do
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 11:23:09AM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:48:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > There is no real problem merging ioends that go beyond i_size into an
> > ioend that doesn't. We just need to move the append transaction to the
> > base ioend.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 12:48:30PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> There is no real problem merging ioends that go beyond i_size into an
> ioend that doesn't. We just need to move the append transaction to the
> base ioend. Also use the opportunity to use a real error code instead
> of the magi
There is no real problem merging ioends that go beyond i_size into an
ioend that doesn't. We just need to move the append transaction to the
base ioend. Also use the opportunity to use a real error code instead
of the magic 1 to cancel the transactions, and write a comment
explaining the scheme.
7 matches
Mail list logo