On 1/31/2017 11:39 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:13:49AM +0100, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
On 1/31/2017 10:11 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
The stmmac_mdio_busy_wait() function do the same job than
readl_poll_timeout().
So is is better to replace it.
Signed-off-by: Corentin L
On 1/31/2017 10:11 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
The stmmac_mdio_busy_wait() function do the same job than
readl_poll_timeout().
So is is better to replace it.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe
I just wonder if you also tested it, this impacts all the platforms
where SMA block is used
if yes, pls co
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 11:13:49AM +0100, Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote:
> On 1/31/2017 10:11 AM, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > The stmmac_mdio_busy_wait() function do the same job than
> > readl_poll_timeout().
> > So is is better to replace it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe
>
> I just wonder if
The stmmac_mdio_busy_wait() function do the same job than
readl_poll_timeout().
So is is better to replace it.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_mdio.c | 33 ---
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers
4 matches
Mail list logo