On 05/20/13 14:29, Viresh Kumar wrote:
[...]
Rafael, if you don't mind, let me take this into Samsung tree for v3.11.
Sure, please go ahead.
Kukjin,
I hope you have already applied this for linux-next?
Yeah, already done in my local and you can see it in my public tree in a
couple of
On 05/20/13 14:29, Viresh Kumar wrote:
[...]
Rafael, if you don't mind, let me take this into Samsung tree for v3.11.
Sure, please go ahead.
Kukjin,
I hope you have already applied this for linux-next?
Yeah, already done in my local and you can see it in my public tree in a
couple of
On 14 May 2013 18:30, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 09:36:42 PM Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> >
>> > On 13 May 2013 16:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > > That doesn't matter I suppose. I can take it, but please rebase it on
>> > top
>> > > of current
On 14 May 2013 18:30, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 09:36:42 PM Kukjin Kim wrote:
Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 13 May 2013 16:21, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
That doesn't matter I suppose. I can take it, but please rebase it on
top
of current
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 09:36:42 PM Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >
> > On 13 May 2013 16:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > That doesn't matter I suppose. I can take it, but please rebase it on
> > top
> > > of current linux-next.
> >
> > I have already done that (attached). But
Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> On 13 May 2013 16:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > That doesn't matter I suppose. I can take it, but please rebase it on
> top
> > of current linux-next.
>
> I have already done that (attached). But i wasn't sure what Kukjin wants
> as
> he may report conflicts again
Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 13 May 2013 16:21, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
That doesn't matter I suppose. I can take it, but please rebase it on
top
of current linux-next.
I have already done that (attached). But i wasn't sure what Kukjin wants
as
he may report conflicts again
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 09:36:42 PM Kukjin Kim wrote:
Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 13 May 2013 16:21, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
That doesn't matter I suppose. I can take it, but please rebase it on
top
of current linux-next.
I have already done that (attached). But i
On 13 May 2013 16:21, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> That doesn't matter I suppose. I can take it, but please rebase it on top
> of current linux-next.
I have already done that (attached). But i wasn't sure what Kukjin wants as
he may report conflicts again and i will ask the same question for 3.12
On Monday, May 13, 2013 11:35:22 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 23 April 2013 20:55, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > On 04/05/13 20:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>
> >> On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>
> Basically,
On 23 April 2013 20:55, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 04/05/13 20:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
>>>
>>> On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based
on
On 23 April 2013 20:55, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 04/05/13 20:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kimkgene@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be
On Monday, May 13, 2013 11:35:22 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 23 April 2013 20:55, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 04/05/13 20:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kimkgene@samsung.com wrote:
On 13 May 2013 16:21, Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl wrote:
That doesn't matter I suppose. I can take it, but please rebase it on top
of current linux-next.
I have already done that (attached). But i wasn't sure what Kukjin wants as
he may report conflicts again and i will ask the same
On Friday, April 26, 2013 01:48:19 AM Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 04/24/13 07:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> Rafael, please take this patch with my ack in your tree, sorry for noise.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Kukjin Kim
> >>
> >> If any problems, please kindly let me know.
> >
> > Well, I
On Friday, April 26, 2013 01:48:19 AM Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 04/24/13 07:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
Rafael, please take this patch with my ack in your tree, sorry for noise.
Acked-by: Kukjin Kimkgene@samsung.com
If any problems, please kindly let me know.
Well, I
On 04/24/13 07:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
Rafael, please take this patch with my ack in your tree, sorry for noise.
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim
If any problems, please kindly let me know.
Well, I suppose I can take the original patch, but then it will conflict with
your tree during merge.
On 04/24/13 07:59, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
Rafael, please take this patch with my ack in your tree, sorry for noise.
Acked-by: Kukjin Kimkgene@samsung.com
If any problems, please kindly let me know.
Well, I suppose I can take the original patch, but then it will conflict with
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:25:59 AM Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 04/05/13 20:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >>> Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
>
On 04/05/13 20:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this
On 04/05/13 20:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kimkgene@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many
On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 12:25:59 AM Kukjin Kim wrote:
On 04/05/13 20:36, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kimkgene@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
> > >
> > > Well, I'm dropping it. Please merge via the Samsung tree.
> > >
> > OK, I will.
> >
> > I got patch file from Viresh, and there is a sign from Rafael,
> > but it should be ack. So Rafael, let me use your ack on this patch when
> > I apply. If any
On Monday, April 08, 2013 06:15:09 PM Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > > Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based
> > on
> > > >
On 8 April 2013 14:45, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> Well, I'm dropping it. Please merge via the Samsung tree.
>>
> OK, I will.
>
> I got patch file from Viresh, and there is a sign from Rafael, but it should
> be ack. So Rafael, let me use your ack on this patch when I apply.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > > Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based
> on
> > > for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff
> so
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based
on
for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung
On 8 April 2013 14:45, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well, I'm dropping it. Please merge via the Samsung tree.
OK, I will.
I got patch file from Viresh, and there is a sign from Rafael, but it should
be ack. So Rafael, let me use your ack on this patch
On Monday, April 08, 2013 06:15:09 PM Kukjin Kim wrote:
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based
on
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
[...]
Well, I'm dropping it. Please merge via the Samsung tree.
OK, I will.
I got patch file from Viresh, and there is a sign from Rafael,
but it should be ack. So Rafael, let me use your ack on this patch when
I apply. If any problems, please let me
On 5 April 2013 12:36, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim wrote:
>> Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
>> for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this
>> should be sent to upstream via samsung tree.
>
>
On 5 April 2013 12:36, Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this
should be
On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
> > for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this
> > should be sent to upstream via
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
> for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this
> should be sent to upstream via samsung tree.
Hmm... Its already applied in Rafael's tree. But it
Viresh Kumar wrote:
>
> This patch moves cpufreq driver of Samsung's ARM based s3c24xx platform to
> drivers/cpufreq.
>
> Cc: Ben Dooks
> Cc: Kukjin Kim
> Cc: linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
Viresh Kumar wrote:
This patch moves cpufreq driver of Samsung's ARM based s3c24xx platform to
drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Ben Dooks ben-li...@fluff.org
Cc: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Cc: linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this
should be sent to upstream via samsung tree.
Hmm... Its already applied in
On Friday, April 05, 2013 12:36:34 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
On 5 April 2013 12:18, Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com wrote:
Basically, this moving looks good to me, but should be re-worked based on
for-next of samsung tree because this touches too many samsung stuff so this
should be sent to
This patch moves cpufreq driver of Samsung's ARM based s3c24xx platform to
drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Ben Dooks
Cc: Kukjin Kim
Cc: linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann
---
arch/arm/Kconfig
This patch moves cpufreq driver of Samsung's ARM based s3c24xx platform to
drivers/cpufreq.
Cc: Ben Dooks ben-li...@fluff.org
Cc: Kukjin Kim kgene@samsung.com
Cc: linux-samsung-...@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.ku...@linaro.org
40 matches
Mail list logo
