From: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
__GFP_REPEAT has a rather weak semantic but since it has been introduced
around 2.6.12 it has been ignored for low order allocations.
pte_alloc_one{_kernel} allocate PTE_ORDER which is 0. This means that
this flag has never been actually useful here because it has always been
used only for PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY requests.
Cc: Ley Foon Tan <lf...@altera.com>
Cc: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
---
arch/nios2/include/asm/pgalloc.h | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/nios2/include/asm/pgalloc.h b/arch/nios2/include/asm/pgalloc.h
index 6e2985e0a7b9..bb47d08c8ef7 100644
--- a/arch/nios2/include/asm/pgalloc.h
+++ b/arch/nios2/include/asm/pgalloc.h
@@ -42,8 +42,7 @@ static inline pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct
*mm,
{
pte_t *pte;
- pte = (pte_t *) __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_REPEAT|__GFP_ZERO,
- PTE_ORDER);
+ pte = (pte_t *) __get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_ZERO, PTE_ORDER);
return pte;
}
@@ -53,7 +52,7 @@ static inline pgtable_t pte_alloc_one(struct mm_struct *mm,
{
struct page *pte;
- pte = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_REPEAT, PTE_ORDER);
+ pte = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL, PTE_ORDER);
if (pte) {
if (!pgtable_page_ctor(pte)) {
__free_page(pte);
--
2.8.1
