From: Dave Hansen
MPX has the _potential_ to cause some issues. Say part of your init
system tried to protect one of its components from buffer overflows
with MPX. If there were a false positive, it's possible that MPX
could keep a system from booting.
MPX could also potentially cause perform
On 03/27/2015 08:07 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> xtensions (MPX) disabled\n");
> WARNING: printk() should include KERN_ facility level
> #52: FILE: arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c:186:
> + printk("nompx: Intel Memory Protection Extensions (MPX) disabled\n");
>
> checkpatch is sometimes right.
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:33:43AM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
>
> From: Dave Hansen
>
> MPX has the _potential_ to cause some issues. Say part of your init
> system tried to protect one of its components from buffer overflows
> with MPX. If there were a false positive, it's possible that MPX
>
From: Dave Hansen
MPX has the _potential_ to cause some issues. Say part of your init
system tried to protect one of its components from buffer overflows
with MPX. If there were a false positive, it's possible that MPX
could keep a system from booting.
MPX could also potentially cause perform
4 matches
Mail list logo
