From: Lars Ellenberg
Regression introduced with 8.4.5
drbd: application writes may set-in-sync in protocol != C
Overwriting the same block (LBA) while a former version is still
"in-flight" to the peer (to be exact: we did not receive the
P_BARRIER_ACK for its epoch
From: Lars Ellenberg
Regression introduced with 8.4.5
drbd: application writes may set-in-sync in protocol != C
Overwriting the same block (LBA) while a former version is still
"in-flight" to the peer (to be exact: we did not receive the
P_BARRIER_ACK for its epoch yet) would wait for the full
From: Lars Ellenberg
Regression introduced with 8.4.5
drbd: application writes may set-in-sync in protocol != C
Overwriting the same block (LBA) while a former version is still
"in-flight" to the peer (to be exact: we did not receive the
P_BARRIER_ACK for its epoch
From: Lars Ellenberg
Regression introduced with 8.4.5
drbd: application writes may set-in-sync in protocol != C
Overwriting the same block (LBA) while a former version is still
"in-flight" to the peer (to be exact: we did not receive the
P_BARRIER_ACK for its epoch yet) would wait for the full
From: Lars Ellenberg
Regression introduced with 8.4.5
drbd: application writes may set-in-sync in protocol != C
Overwriting the same block (LBA) while a former version is still
"in-flight" to the peer (to be exact: we did not receive the
P_BARRIER_ACK for its epoch
From: Lars Ellenberg
Regression introduced with 8.4.5
drbd: application writes may set-in-sync in protocol != C
Overwriting the same block (LBA) while a former version is still
"in-flight" to the peer (to be exact: we did not receive the
P_BARRIER_ACK for its epoch yet) would wait for the full
6 matches
Mail list logo