Re: [PATCH 09/17] ARM: imx: select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND if necessary

2012-10-07 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Sunday 07 October 2012, Shawn Guo wrote: > Isn't the following the approach we agreed on? > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/183222/focus=1348538 > Yes, you are right, my mistake. That patch was already merged, I just accidentally picked up the older one again when going

Re: [PATCH 09/17] ARM: imx: select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND if necessary

2012-10-06 Thread Shawn Guo
Isn't the following the approach we agreed on? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.kernel/183222/focus=1348538 Shawn On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 06:36:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > As tests using 'make randconfig' showed, imx5 requires the same logic > as imx6 to select ARM_CPU_SUSPEN

[PATCH 09/17] ARM: imx: select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND if necessary

2012-10-02 Thread Arnd Bergmann
As tests using 'make randconfig' showed, imx5 requires the same logic as imx6 to select ARM_CPU_SUSPEND when building with power management enabled. The defconfig does not have this problem because it enables imx6 as well, but disabling it leads to this warning: arch/arm/mach-imx/built-in.o: In f