Hi Yoann,
Yoann Padioleau wrote:
When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
comempci.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1
Hi Yoann,
Yoann Padioleau wrote:
When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
comempci.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1
When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch:
@@
expression *E;
@@
E ==
- 0
+ NULL
@@
expression *E;
@@
E !=
- 0
+ NULL
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
When comparing a pointer, it's clearer to compare it to NULL than to 0.
Here is an excerpt of the semantic patch:
@@
expression *E;
@@
E ==
- 0
+ NULL
@@
expression *E;
@@
E !=
- 0
+ NULL
Signed-off-by: Yoann Padioleau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
4 matches
Mail list logo