On 6/14/17 11:27 PM, Tim Savannah wrote:
> Any comments? Can we get this merged, or some variation? It affects a
> lot more than just all my machines. Google shows this traceback is
> occurring for others as well.
Hi Tim -
This patch was merged for 4.12:
commit 1e0e653f1136a413a9969e5d0d548ee649
Any comments? Can we get this merged, or some variation? It affects a
lot more than just all my machines. Google shows this traceback is
occurring for others as well.
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:57 AM, Tim Savannah wrote:
> Oops, sent last one without patch on accident. Attached this time.
>
>
> T
Oops, sent last one without patch on accident. Attached this time.
This has been happening for me since 4.10
dquot_writeback_dquots expects a lock to be held on super_block->s_umount ,
and reiserfs_sync_fs, which calls dquot_writeback_dquots, does not
obtain such a lock.
Thus, the following wa
This has been happening for me since 4.10
dquot_writeback_dquots expects a lock to be held on super_block->s_umount ,
and reiserfs_sync_fs, which calls dquot_writeback_dquots, does not
obtain such a lock.
Thus, the following warning is generated:
[Sun May 28 04:58:06 2017] [ cut her
4 matches
Mail list logo