On Tue, 04 Dec 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Sat, 01 Dec 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>
> >> > When the STMPE IRQ is triggered to be active high level-sensitive, the
> >> > Nomadik
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Sat, 01 Dec 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>>
>> > When the STMPE IRQ is triggered to be active high level-sensitive, the
>> > Nomadik GPIO controller it uses complains, although it still wor
On Sat, 01 Dec 2012, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > When the STMPE IRQ is triggered to be active high level-sensitive, the
> > Nomadik GPIO controller it uses complains, although it still works.
> > Recently we attempted to move triggering to low-t
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:24 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> When the STMPE IRQ is triggered to be active high level-sensitive, the
> Nomadik GPIO controller it uses complains, although it still works.
> Recently we attempted to move triggering to low-to-high in an attempt
> to prevent the warning; howeve
When the STMPE IRQ is triggered to be active high level-sensitive, the
Nomadik GPIO controller it uses complains, although it still works.
Recently we attempted to move triggering to low-to-high in an attempt
to prevent the warning; however, this ensured that the IRQ was actually
missed completely.
5 matches
Mail list logo