On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:22:06PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >>
> >> Not having this patch in v3.6-rcN gives the following boot noise (and
> >> the key does not work):
> >>
>
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 10:03 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>
>> Not having this patch in v3.6-rcN gives the following boot noise (and
>> the key does not work):
>>
>> [ cut here ]
>> WARNING: at /home/elinwal/linux-s
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > If we're booting with Device Tree enabled, we want the IRQ numbers to
> > be taken and translated from the Device Tree binary. If not, they
> > should be taken from the resource
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> If we're booting with Device Tree enabled, we want the IRQ numbers to
> be taken and translated from the Device Tree binary. If not, they
> should be taken from the resource allocation defined in the AB8500 MFD
> core driver.
>
> Tested-by: Linus
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 12:40:38PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:49:52AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > - MFD adds the IRQ base to the hwirq and registers it as a virq
> > Just don't do this step - the only reason to do it is for mapping back
> > into a linear domain but i
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 10:49:52AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:04:12AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > During non-DT boot:
> > - Platform data is passed, which contains an IRQ base
> > - If an IRQ base is requested we use it to register a Legacy IRQ Domain
> > - MFD adds
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 08:28:35AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> In general, it seems easier to use the same domain type for both cases.
> I don't think that MOP500_AB8500_VIR_GPIO_IRQ_BASE is used anywhere
> else besides the .irq_base definition in board-mop500.c, so I would guess
> that you can
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 09:04:12AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> During non-DT boot:
> - Platform data is passed, which contains an IRQ base
> - If an IRQ base is requested we use it to register a Legacy IRQ Domain
> - MFD adds the IRQ base to the hwirq and registers it as a virq
Just don't do thi
On Wednesday 08 August 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
> Okay, actually this isn't so easy. Currently we have:
>
> During DT boot:
> - No platform data is passed, hence no IRQ base for AB8500 is either
> - No IRQ base means we register a Linear IRQ Domain
> - MFD sees there is no base and leaves the IRQ
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 06:03:34PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 06:01:30PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Okay, so I've just spent a small amount of time looking at this. I think
> > the best place for this would be in *_get_virq(), using the same logic that
> > selected a *_l
> Restating my comment elsewhere... why do we even need to do this in
> _get_virq() - I'd *really* expect this to be handled by the irq domain
> code.
> > Okay, so I've just spent a small amount of time looking at this. I think
> > the best place for this would be in *_get_virq(), using the same
On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 06:01:30PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> Okay, so I've just spent a small amount of time looking at this. I think
> the best place for this would be in *_get_virq(), using the same logic that
> selected a *_legacy or *_linear domain in the first place. The only thing
> the dom
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:02:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 04:37:52PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:19:15AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > > > + ponkey->irq_dbf = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf) :
> > > > irq_dbf;
> > > >
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 05:02:26PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 04:37:52PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:19:15AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>
> > > > + ponkey->irq_dbf = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf) :
> > > > irq_dbf;
> > > >
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 04:37:52PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:19:15AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > > + ponkey->irq_dbf = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf) : irq_dbf;
> > > + ponkey->irq_dbr = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbr) : irq_dbr;
> > Why t
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:19:15AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > - ponkey->irq_dbf = ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf);
> > - ponkey->irq_dbr = ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbr);
> > +
> > + ponkey->irq_dbf = (np) ? ab8500_irq_get_virq(ab8500, irq_dbf) : irq_dbf;
> > + ponkey->irq
Hi Lee,
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 01:32:03PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> If we're booting with Device Tree enabled, we want the IRQ numbers to
> be taken and translated from the Device Tree binary. If not, they
> should be taken from the resource allocation defined in the AB8500 MFD
> core driver.
>
If we're booting with Device Tree enabled, we want the IRQ numbers to
be taken and translated from the Device Tree binary. If not, they
should be taken from the resource allocation defined in the AB8500 MFD
core driver.
Tested-by: Linus Walleij
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
---
drivers/input/misc/ab
18 matches
Mail list logo
