Hi Ulf,
On 18:50 Tue 22 Oct , Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > And this is after the patch has been applied:
> > KB reclen write rewritereadreread
> >51200 4 251 990 3280 3244
> >51200 8 4601545 4460 4463
> >
On 22 October 2013 13:21, Oskar Andero wrote:
> Hi Ulf,
>
> On 17:01 Wed 16 Oct , Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> Hi Oskar / Lars,
>>
>> Sorry for the delayed response!
>>
>> On 10 October 2013 15:28, Oskar Andero wrote:
>> > From: Lars Svensson
>> >
>> > Some error bits in the status field of R1/R1b
Hi Ulf,
On 17:01 Wed 16 Oct , Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Hi Oskar / Lars,
>
> Sorry for the delayed response!
>
> On 10 October 2013 15:28, Oskar Andero wrote:
> > From: Lars Svensson
> >
> > Some error bits in the status field of R1/R1b response are only set
> > by the device in response to the
Hi Oskar / Lars,
Sorry for the delayed response!
On 10 October 2013 15:28, Oskar Andero wrote:
> From: Lars Svensson
>
> Some error bits in the status field of R1/R1b response are only set
> by the device in response to the command following the failing
> command. The status is only read and ch
From: Lars Svensson
Some error bits in the status field of R1/R1b response are only set
by the device in response to the command following the failing
command. The status is only read and checked after a r/w command if
an error is detected during the initial command or the following data
transfer
5 matches
Mail list logo