Stephen Warren wrote @ Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:23:38 +0100:
> On 03/14/2013 03:08 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> > Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
> > cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
> > when supporting a new SoC where each PM
Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote @ Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:23:38 +0100:
On 03/14/2013 03:08 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
when supporting a new SoC where
On 03/14/2013 03:08 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
> cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
> when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled
> one-by-one during its depelopment.
Looks
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:08:09AM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
> Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
> cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
> when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled
> one-by-one during its
Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled
one-by-one during its depelopment.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu
Reported-by: Joseph Lo
---
Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled
one-by-one during its depelopment.
Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com
Reported-by:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:08:09AM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled
one-by-one during its
On 03/14/2013 03:08 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote:
Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not
cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially
when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled
one-by-one during its depelopment.
Looks fine
8 matches
Mail list logo