Re: [PATCH 1/1] amba: tegra-ahb: Fix build error w/ PM_SLEEP w/o PM_RUNTIME

2013-03-15 Thread Hiroshi Doyu
Stephen Warren wrote @ Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:23:38 +0100: > On 03/14/2013 03:08 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > > Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not > > cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially > > when supporting a new SoC where each PM

Re: [PATCH 1/1] amba: tegra-ahb: Fix build error w/ PM_SLEEP w/o PM_RUNTIME

2013-03-15 Thread Hiroshi Doyu
Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote @ Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:23:38 +0100: On 03/14/2013 03:08 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially when supporting a new SoC where

Re: [PATCH 1/1] amba: tegra-ahb: Fix build error w/ PM_SLEEP w/o PM_RUNTIME

2013-03-14 Thread Stephen Warren
On 03/14/2013 03:08 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not > cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially > when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled > one-by-one during its depelopment. Looks

Re: [PATCH 1/1] amba: tegra-ahb: Fix build error w/ PM_SLEEP w/o PM_RUNTIME

2013-03-14 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:08:09AM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: > Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not > cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially > when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled > one-by-one during its

[PATCH 1/1] amba: tegra-ahb: Fix build error w/ PM_SLEEP w/o PM_RUNTIME

2013-03-14 Thread Hiroshi Doyu
Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled one-by-one during its depelopment. Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu Reported-by: Joseph Lo ---

[PATCH 1/1] amba: tegra-ahb: Fix build error w/ PM_SLEEP w/o PM_RUNTIME

2013-03-14 Thread Hiroshi Doyu
Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled one-by-one during its depelopment. Signed-off-by: Hiroshi Doyu hd...@nvidia.com Reported-by:

Re: [PATCH 1/1] amba: tegra-ahb: Fix build error w/ PM_SLEEP w/o PM_RUNTIME

2013-03-14 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:08:09AM +0200, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled one-by-one during its

Re: [PATCH 1/1] amba: tegra-ahb: Fix build error w/ PM_SLEEP w/o PM_RUNTIME

2013-03-14 Thread Stephen Warren
On 03/14/2013 03:08 AM, Hiroshi Doyu wrote: Make this depend on CONFIG_PM. This protection is necessary to not cause any build errors with any combination of PM features especially when supporting a new SoC where each PM features are being enabled one-by-one during its depelopment. Looks fine