On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:10:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:53:54 -0500
> "Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This fixes a problem with the way cciss was filling out the "errors"
> > field of the request structure upon completion of requests.
> >
On Fri, Aug 24, 2007 at 05:10:47PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:53:54 -0500
Mike Miller (OS Dev) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This fixes a problem with the way cciss was filling out the errors
field of the request structure upon completion of requests.
Previously, it
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:53:54 -0500
"Mike Miller (OS Dev)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This fixes a problem with the way cciss was filling out the "errors"
> field of the request structure upon completion of requests.
> Previously, it just put a 1 or a 0 in there and used the negation
> of this
- Forwarded message from Steve Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:10:44 -0500
From: Steve Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cciss: fix error reporting for SG_IO
On Tue, Aug 14 2007, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote:
> Patch 1/1
> Steve has been trying to send this out but it doesn't seem to be getting
> anywhere. Please review this patch for accuracy. There's a couple of things
> not clear to us.
>
> Thanks,
> mikem
>
>
On Tue, Aug 14 2007, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote:
Patch 1/1
Steve has been trying to send this out but it doesn't seem to be getting
anywhere. Please review this patch for accuracy. There's a couple of things
not clear to us.
Thanks,
mikem
- Forwarded message from Steve Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:10:44 -0500
From: Steve Cameron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] cciss: fix error reporting for SG_IO
This fixes
On Fri, 24 Aug 2007 12:53:54 -0500
Mike Miller (OS Dev) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This fixes a problem with the way cciss was filling out the errors
field of the request structure upon completion of requests.
Previously, it just put a 1 or a 0 in there and used the negation
of this as the
Any feedback on my patch?
Anybody know what the msg_byte in include/scsi/scsi.h
is for?
scsi.h says:
* msg_byte= return status from host adapter itself.
So, it's ok to use the msg_byte for device specific error codes?
-- steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Any feedback on my patch?
Anybody know what the msg_byte in include/scsi/scsi.h
is for?
scsi.h says:
* msg_byte= return status from host adapter itself.
So, it's ok to use the msg_byte for device specific error codes?
-- steve
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Patch 1/1
Steve has been trying to send this out but it doesn't seem to be getting
anywhere. Please review this patch for accuracy. There's a couple of things
not clear to us.
Thanks,
mikem
We found a problem with
Patch 1/1
Steve has been trying to send this out but it doesn't seem to be getting
anywhere. Please review this patch for accuracy. There's a couple of things
not clear to us.
Thanks,
mikem
We found a problem with
12 matches
Mail list logo
