Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpuidle: coupled: fix ready counter decrement

2012-12-14 Thread Colin Cross
On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Friday, December 14, 2012 10:42:08 AM Sivaram Nair wrote: >> The ready_waiting_counts atomic variable is compared against the wrong >> online cpu count. The latter is computed incorrectly using logical-OR >> instead of bit-OR. This pat

Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpuidle: coupled: fix ready counter decrement

2012-12-14 Thread Santosh Shilimkar
On Friday 14 December 2012 09:42 AM, Sivaram Nair wrote: The ready_waiting_counts atomic variable is compared against the wrong online cpu count. The latter is computed incorrectly using logical-OR instead of bit-OR. This patch fixes that. Signed-off-by: Sivaram Nair --- Looks right. Acked-by:

Re: [PATCH 1/1] cpuidle: coupled: fix ready counter decrement

2012-12-14 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
On Friday, December 14, 2012 10:42:08 AM Sivaram Nair wrote: > The ready_waiting_counts atomic variable is compared against the wrong > online cpu count. The latter is computed incorrectly using logical-OR > instead of bit-OR. This patch fixes that. I'm queuing this up for submission as v3.8 mater

[PATCH 1/1] cpuidle: coupled: fix ready counter decrement

2012-12-14 Thread Sivaram Nair
The ready_waiting_counts atomic variable is compared against the wrong online cpu count. The latter is computed incorrectly using logical-OR instead of bit-OR. This patch fixes that. Signed-off-by: Sivaram Nair --- drivers/cpuidle/coupled.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-