On Rab, 2017-03-01 at 12:34 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Loh, Tien Hock com> wrote:
> >
> > On Rab, 2017-03-01 at 10:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Loh, Tien Hock > > el.c
>
On Rab, 2017-03-01 at 12:34 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Loh, Tien Hock com> wrote:
> >
> > On Rab, 2017-03-01 at 10:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Loh, Tien Hock > > el.c
> > > Another option would be to fold the
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Loh, Tien Hock wrote:
> On Rab, 2017-03-01 at 10:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Loh, Tien Hock > Another option would be to fold the timestamp into the revision
>> attribute,
>>
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Loh, Tien Hock wrote:
> On Rab, 2017-03-01 at 10:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Loh, Tien Hock > Another option would be to fold the timestamp into the revision
>> attribute,
>> but whether that is a reasonable place for it would
On Rab, 2017-03-01 at 10:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Loh, Tien Hock om> wrote:
> >
> > Arnd, Greg,
> Please don't top-post.
OK.
>
> >
> > I checked the attributes returned by the soc attribute subsystem,
> > but
> > it seems that it
On Rab, 2017-03-01 at 10:01 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Loh, Tien Hock om> wrote:
> >
> > Arnd, Greg,
> Please don't top-post.
OK.
>
> >
> > I checked the attributes returned by the soc attribute subsystem,
> > but
> > it seems that it is lacking something
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Loh, Tien Hock wrote:
> Arnd, Greg,
Please don't top-post.
> I checked the attributes returned by the soc attribute subsystem, but
> it seems that it is lacking something equivalent to timestamp in the
> Intel System ID controller. Do you
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 8:23 AM, Loh, Tien Hock wrote:
> Arnd, Greg,
Please don't top-post.
> I checked the attributes returned by the soc attribute subsystem, but
> it seems that it is lacking something equivalent to timestamp in the
> Intel System ID controller. Do you think it is better to
Arnd, Greg,
I checked the attributes returned by the soc attribute subsystem, but
it seems that it is lacking something equivalent to timestamp in the
Intel System ID controller. Do you think it is better to add a new
attribute (named timestamp) to soc or create a new sysfs entry like
what I did?
Arnd, Greg,
I checked the attributes returned by the soc attribute subsystem, but
it seems that it is lacking something equivalent to timestamp in the
Intel System ID controller. Do you think it is better to add a new
attribute (named timestamp) to soc or create a new sysfs entry like
what I did?
OK then I'll move it into driver/soc/ in that case.
On Kha, 2017-02-23 at 09:05 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Loh, Tien Hock com> wrote:
> >
> > On Rab, 2017-02-15 at 20:51 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at
OK then I'll move it into driver/soc/ in that case.
On Kha, 2017-02-23 at 09:05 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Loh, Tien Hock com> wrote:
> >
> > On Rab, 2017-02-15 at 20:51 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Greg KH > >
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Loh, Tien Hock wrote:
> On Rab, 2017-02-15 at 20:51 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Greg KH
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:09:41PM +0800, thloh wrote:
>> > >
>> >
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Loh, Tien Hock wrote:
> On Rab, 2017-02-15 at 20:51 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Greg KH
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:09:41PM +0800, thloh wrote:
>> > >
>> > > From: "Loh, Tien Hock"
>> > >
>> > > This patch
Sorry for the late reply.
This driver can currently be used by ARM and Nios II, so moving it into
drivers/soc might not be the best idea.
Thanks
Tien Hock
On Rab, 2017-02-15 at 20:51 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Greg KH
> wrote:
> >
Sorry for the late reply.
This driver can currently be used by ARM and Nios II, so moving it into
drivers/soc might not be the best idea.
Thanks
Tien Hock
On Rab, 2017-02-15 at 20:51 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Greg KH
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017
Sorry for the late reply. I'll add the Documentation/ABI description,
use DEVICE_ATTR_RO and update ATTRIBUTE_GROUP.
Thanks
Tien Hock
On Rab, 2017-02-15 at 09:17 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:09:41PM +0800, thloh wrote:
> >
> > From: "Loh, Tien Hock"
Sorry for the late reply. I'll add the Documentation/ABI description,
use DEVICE_ATTR_RO and update ATTRIBUTE_GROUP.
Thanks
Tien Hock
On Rab, 2017-02-15 at 09:17 -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:09:41PM +0800, thloh wrote:
> >
> > From: "Loh, Tien Hock"
> >
> > This patch
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:09:41PM +0800, thloh wrote:
>> From: "Loh, Tien Hock"
>>
>> This patch is to add Altera System ID driver.
>> User can obtain the system ID and timestamp of the system
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 6:17 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:09:41PM +0800, thloh wrote:
>> From: "Loh, Tien Hock"
>>
>> This patch is to add Altera System ID driver.
>> User can obtain the system ID and timestamp of the system by
>> reading the sysfs entry.
>>
>> Usage:
>> cat
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:09:41PM +0800, thloh wrote:
> From: "Loh, Tien Hock"
>
> This patch is to add Altera System ID driver.
> User can obtain the system ID and timestamp of the system by
> reading the sysfs entry.
>
> Usage:
> cat
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:09:41PM +0800, thloh wrote:
> From: "Loh, Tien Hock"
>
> This patch is to add Altera System ID driver.
> User can obtain the system ID and timestamp of the system by
> reading the sysfs entry.
>
> Usage:
> cat /sys/bus/platform/devices/[addr].sysid/sysid/id
> cat
22 matches
Mail list logo