Re: [PATCH 1/1] edac: fix improper return value

2016-12-04 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 02:07:18PM +0800, Pan Bian wrote: > From: Pan Bian > > When the call to zalloc_cpumask_var() fails, returning "false" seems > improper. The real value of macro "false" is 0, and 0 means no error. > This patch fixes the bug, returning "-ENOMEM". > >

Re: [PATCH 1/1] edac: fix improper return value

2016-12-04 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 02:07:18PM +0800, Pan Bian wrote: > From: Pan Bian > > When the call to zalloc_cpumask_var() fails, returning "false" seems > improper. The real value of macro "false" is 0, and 0 means no error. > This patch fixes the bug, returning "-ENOMEM". > > Bugzilla:

[PATCH 1/1] edac: fix improper return value

2016-12-03 Thread Pan Bian
From: Pan Bian When the call to zalloc_cpumask_var() fails, returning "false" seems improper. The real value of macro "false" is 0, and 0 means no error. This patch fixes the bug, returning "-ENOMEM". Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189071

[PATCH 1/1] edac: fix improper return value

2016-12-03 Thread Pan Bian
From: Pan Bian When the call to zalloc_cpumask_var() fails, returning "false" seems improper. The real value of macro "false" is 0, and 0 means no error. This patch fixes the bug, returning "-ENOMEM". Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=189071 Signed-off-by: Pan Bian ---