> "Sagar" == Sagar Kadam writes:
> Hello Peter,
>> Are both affected by this issue? if not, we will need to extend the code
>> to handle them differently.
>>
> No, this issue is present in FU540-C000 SoC i.e SoC- specific, and so I can
> check
> for the soc-compatible string as
Walmsley ( Sifive)
> ; pal...@dabbelt.com;
> a...@eecs.berkeley.edu
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] i2c: ocores: fix polling mode workaround on FU540-
> C000 SoC
>
> [External Email] Do not click links or attachments unless you recognize the
> sender and know the content is safe
>
> "Sagar" == Sagar Shrikant Kadam writes:
> The FU540-C000 has a broken IRQ and support was added earlier
> so that it will operate in polling mode, but seems to work only
> in case interrupts property is missing from the i2c0 dt-node.
> This should not be the case and the driver should
The FU540-C000 has a broken IRQ and support was added earlier
so that it will operate in polling mode, but seems to work only
in case interrupts property is missing from the i2c0 dt-node.
This should not be the case and the driver should handle polling
mode with the interrupt property present in
4 matches
Mail list logo
